USDFI - The revolution will not be centralized.
  • USDFI Working Paper
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
      • Custodial Stablecoins
      • Non-custodial Stablecoins
    • USDFI Design
      • Introduction
      • The Decentralized Stablecoin Trilemma
      • Design Considerations
      • Financial stability: AMOs, BLR, AMMLR & The DeFi Trinity
    • USDFI Stability Mechanisms
  • Dual ve-tokenomics
    • Introduction
    • Liquidity Incentivization
      • Curve Finance
      • Olympus DAO
      • Zero-sum, ve and ve(3,3)
      • Dual-ve model
    • Analysis of dual-ve
  • USDFI: The protocol for protocols
    • How to get deep liquidity for your token
    • Problem: Bootstrapping your liquidity
    • Solution: USDFI P4P
  • USDFI explained in 120 seconds
    • Vision
    • Dual-ve tokenomics
    • STABLE/veSTABLE
    • USDFI/veUSDFI
  • USDFI AMM
    • Understanding Automated Market Makers
      • How-to execute a token swap
        • Token prices
        • Price Impact
        • Price Slippage
        • Price Impact vs Slippage
      • Understanding liquidity pools
      • vAMM vs sAMM
      • Understanding AMM users
    • Understanding USDFI's AFSA-Shield
    • Becoming a liquidity provider
      • Whitelisting
      • Dynamic pool fees for partner protocols
    • Understanding USDFI Pools
    • Understanding the USDFI Router
  • USDFI Money Markets
    • Peer-to-Pool Money Markets
    • Lending vs Liquidity
      • Lending
      • Borrowing
      • Liquidiations
      • Advanced Money Market Strategies
      • Contracts
    • Security
      • Token Report (BSC)
  • USDFI Stablecoin
    • Minting
    • Understanding the Minter
  • USDFI Money Legos
    • Introduction
    • Protocols
      • Thena
    • Risks
  • Security
    • About Chainsecurity
    • Audits
    • Contracts
  • More USDFI
    • The USDFI vision
    • Roadmap
    • Tokenomics
    • Pitch Deck
  • GETTING STARTED
    • Connecting a wallet to USDFI
    • Switching networks
    • What's a wallet address?
    • Getting a crypto wallet
    • Understanding Networks and Layers
    • Understanding Layer 2
    • Understanding transaction hashes
    • Understanding approval transactions
    • Network Fees
    • Buy Crypto
      • Credit Card
      • Bank transfer
  • AFFILIATES
    • How to become an USDFI affiliate
  • Brand assets
    • SVGs
  • FAQ
    • General questions about USDFI
    • How is USDFI different from...
    • Questions about the USDFI ecosystem
    • Terms of Use / Legal information
    • Where to find more information
    • Security and audit
    • The most important question
  • LINKS
    • Twitter
    • Discord
    • Telegram
    • Github
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. USDFI Working Paper
  2. USDFI Design

The Decentralized Stablecoin Trilemma

PreviousIntroductionNextDesign Considerations

Last updated 2 years ago

Enter the trilemma of designing a decentralized, non-custodial stablecoin. This design faces the challenge of optimally balancing the aspects of decentralized (here: exogenous) collateral, peg stability and scalability. Finding the right balance while considering the trade-offs is referred to as the decentralized stablecoin trilemma. The trilemma suggests that there is always unavoidable risk.[1] As the next step, we propose how to manage and reduce risk by adding the dimension of time to peg stability considerations to avoid compromising on the other two aspects.

By decentralized collateral we understand the degree to which exogenous collateral in the design is decentralized. Non-USD linked collateral typically indicates some level of decentralization. Zero decentralization can be found in any custodial stablecoin (i.e., USD linked tokens like Tether, USD Coin), while maximum decentralization can be found in Bitcoin. Decentralization must be understood as a spectrum (a level of given risk). For example, a custodial stablecoin can achieve a better level of decentralization with the use of smart contracts (LP tokens etc.), the trade-off being added levels of smart contract, correlation, or complexity risks – while the token stays a risk pass-thru vehicle for the underlying USD-linked collateral risk. Paradoxically, many decentralized stablecoins heavily depend on custodial stablecoins as the source of primary value for the design.

Peg stability refers to the ability of the stablecoin to maintain a stable price relative to an arbitrary value (i.e., USD $1). This is generally understood as a high time preference/must be always there-requirement, simply because existing stablecoin designs cannot automatically resolve for the possibility of an unpredictable destabilization or black swan event creating an under peg scenario.

Generally, a stable price for a non-custodial stablecoin comes from a combination of custodial stablecoins and various stability mechanisms such as swap-based price bonding curves, liquidity provisions, arbitrageurs, liquidators and other economic (dis-)incentives or market operations.

Finally, scalability is linked to capital efficiency. As discussed previously, overcollateralized stablecoin designs are known not to scale long-term and suffer from severe adoption hurdles, typically due to limited coin supply. Conversely, efficient but undercollateralized designs suffer from price instability due to financial risks: Users may lose confidence in a protocol which does not have the full/automated ability to replenish reserves, triggering a run leading to large redemptions and eventually a terminal collapse.


[1] Kwon, Y., Kim, J., Kim, Y., & Song, D. (2021). The Trilemma of Stablecoin. Available at SSRN 3917430. 5.